I fitted the dominant peak and the weaker high-energy peak at each power, using a local linear baseline. The CSV contains each peak’s fitted intensity, position \(x_c\), width, and fit uncertainty.

- [Peak intensity vs power](<<BENCH>/raw/commercial/luna-high/bench/t-pl/run-28/peak_intensity_vs_power.png>)
- [Peak position vs power](<<BENCH>/raw/commercial/luna-high/bench/t-pl/run-28/peak_position_vs_power.png>)
- [Fitted values for every power](<<BENCH>/raw/commercial/luna-high/bench/t-pl/run-28/lorentzian_peak_fits.csv>)

For the dominant peak, the intensity allometric exponent is \(b=0.9254\pm0.0121\); the position exponent is \(0.00447\pm0.00009\). The weaker peak’s intensity exponent is \(0.8979\pm0.0381\); its fitted position varies less consistently with power.

RESULT: b = 0.9254 ± 0.0121